supreme court accessibility screen reader

Retail advocacy groups also note the importance of a Supreme Court decision in setting a federal standard that businesses can use to make their services accessible for all. Their argument in this particular instance is that this case and decision “Stretched the definition too far by deciding that websites and mobile applications must be judged as public accommodations rather than just considered as one of many ways in which a consumer might access a retailer’s offerings.” Yet Domino’s Pizza, along with other groups such as the National Retail Foundation wanted this trial to reach the Supreme Court. But they are not arguing against this ruling because they want to discriminate against blind or otherwise disabled people. They want the trial to go to the Supreme Court to create a federal precedent and define accessibility in regards to the internet. Retailers should make their services accessible to everyone, and regulations are only now beginning to be put in place to reflect this. Circuit Court of Appeals –Domino’s Pizza (along with other similar retailers) have to make their online services accessible. The ruling now stands where it did after the 9 th U.S.

This comes after a blind man sued the company for not having an accessible website, even while using his screen reader. Supreme court decided it would not hear a petition from Domino’s Pizza recently.

Supreme court accessibility screen reader